Again, think of a piece of literature. You can make a commentary on the brief - a statement about different architecture students and architecture studios perhaps? A statement on the nature of monuments? A statement that summariese Kengo Kuma and Alvar Aalto as role models for students?
A good idea would come out of thinking in terms of the concepts in addition to what they would mean to the brief, not just taking week01 exercise as an isolated case and trying to force it into the design of the three places in the final weeks.
Back to the idea of 1+1=3; we want to create something that is highly original yet specific to the design at hand.
Here are some electroliquid aggregation from last year, their brief is different and their clients are different but they all give the feeling of being a piece of literature or a statement instead of something that's instructional. You might then start to imagine how they might be interpreted in an anecdotal or an experiential sense, how you could unpack these into a story about your architecture, rather than working on something that's simply confined to the architectonic realm.
"Being strong and optimistic will lead to a gloomy and cold life."
"The Psychoanalysis observes
The studying professor often perform self inflected pain"
"If the rich and the poor work together, they can all become successful despite their difference in class, wealth and social wellbeing."
"A stubborn and anti-social person need not be two different people. More, one person following two different paths, of wealth and purity, to reach the same destination."
"Academics bounded by the rigidity of facts, wealth and social status must have a medium that is liberating; where reflection, meditation and creativity can stimulate new ideas."
No comments:
Post a Comment